What is a house?…and can it make you rich?

gracelandMuch of this financial independence thing is about rethinking things from first principles.

When you do this, you realise that a lot of conventional wisdom isn’t very wise. Often you must unlearn what you have learned.

Home ownership has come to be seen as A Good Thing.  Mostly this assumption is implicit and unquestioned.  Its easy to see the advantages of owning your own home. A roof over your head. No dealing with landlords that mess you around with deposit deductions.  Somewhere to put down roots.  It’s all obvious stuff.

Or is it? Perhaps we’ve been conditioned to treat getting on (and moving up) the housing ladder as if it were some combination of your civic duty (like voting) and an easy route to riches (as in all those TV property porn shows)?

There’s no doubt that a house is an asset.  But there’s a bit more to it than that…so let’s unbundle what home ownership actually entails.

1. A house is somewhere to live

This is the most important aspect of what a house really is.  I think people sometimes forget that the main purpose of a house is to stop you from freezing to death in the winter and keeping the rain off you. This is one reason why I don’t include my house in my asset allocation or net worth calculation.

Yes, you can buy, do-up and flip your way up the housing ladder. And we did some of that. But, these days, a house for me is primarily somewhere to live rather than a financial asset to be traded.

2. A house is a saving scheme

You can think of mortgage repayments as non-discretionary saving (the capital element at least). This is one reason why many parents are keen for their children to buy a house; it’s a way for them to get into the habit of saving.  Habits are powerful things. Once the mortgage is paid off, that saving habit will serve you well if you push on to full financial independence.

A house is something that people can see, feel, touch… so the purpose of the saving is obvious. That’s the carrot. There’s also a stick. If you stop making the payments, the nice man from the bank is replaced with the nasty man from the bank (see point 7 below).

3. A house is a status symbol

Can we be honest here? Good! So let’s admit that most people think off their house as a status good to some degree.  Even The Escape Artist is not immune from this sort of clownery.  We bought our house about 12 years ago.  If you asked me why we chose it back then, I would probably have muttered something about good schools, being handy for the rail station and being able to walk into town easily.  I probably wouldn’t have said that I wanted somewhere big enough to project my ego and a base from which to plot Total World Domination.

But, if we’re honest, most of us have a bit of Doctor Evil’s attitude to housing in us. Its just that we have less money than him.

volcanoDr Evil has several houses: a large volcano HQ on a tropical island, an underground lair in the desert outside Las Vegas, a skyscraper in Seattle and a holiday home in space.

For Dr Evil a house is not about our basic need for shelter. It’s a statement that he’s a force to be reckoned with.  And it must be massive to hold all his laser beams, nuclear bombs and other status-signalling possessions (see point 6 below).

Not for Dr Evil a shared apartment or small terraced house in a bohemian part of town. No, Dr Evil’s houses must be isolated, detached and bigger than the neighbours.

4. A house is a store of value

Although I don’t think of our house as a financial asset, one day we’ll downsize. Until then, the house acts as a store of value.

In the UK, houses have delivered average annual returns that are not that different to those from shares over the last 100 years or (although the data is patchy and may not fully reflect maintenance costs etc).   In the US, with fewer supply constraints, returns from housing have underperformed those from stocks but have at least kept pace with inflation.

Despite boom-bust cycles, over the long run houses have historically provided a store of value, particularly in inflationary conditions. The way we see houses was shaped by high inflation in the 1970s (up to ~25%) and 1980s.  If you have an asset whose value inflates alongside inflation, funded with a liability (mortgage) whose real value gets eaten away by inflation, then it can look like you can’t go wrong with houses.

5. A house is a source of risk

But the truth is that you can go wrong with houses. The housing market booms and busts like the stockmarket, its just been longer since we had a house price crash and, without quoted prices, its less obvious.

The value of individual houses can be even more volatile. Buying a house means putting a lot of eggs in one basket.  A house is subject to the fortunes (or misfortunes) of one country, one county, one city, one town, one neighbourhood. The risks are many and varied and can be correlated with your other risks.  As Jim Collins puts it:

A plant closes. A street gang moves in. A council goes crazy with taxes. An environmental disaster happens nearby. We could have an investment that not only crushes it’s owner’s net worth, but does so even as they are losing their job and income

6. A house is a space that gets filled

Nature abhors a vacuum.

If you buy a house, you (or your significant other) will fill it with shit furniture, fluffy cushions, curtains and other toys.  If you buy a bigger house, you will fill it with more shit. Shit that costs money.

It’s not entirely clear why this should be the case. I just know that it is.

7. A house is collateral for a loan

A house is (usually) bought with a mortgage. A mortgage is a form of debt or leverage. Leverage can’t turn a bad investment into a good investment.  But it can turn a bad investment into a disaster.  Its sensible to run the numbers and see what things would look like if interest rates went up a lot.  Interest rates went to 15% as recently as 1993. Just saying.

One of the reasons people think that housing is a better investment than it really is, is because they don’t see the hidden risks of leverage. So they don’t see the alternative histories that could have played out where a job loss or illness bankrupted them. Coulda happened.

Mortgages in the UK have personal recourse…so even if they repossess your house, you can still be held liable for any shortfall on a sale. To put it more simply, if you can’t pay, they can take you away.  How many people who take out a mortgage fully understand this?

A house provides security for the mortgage lender. For you as the borrower? Not so much. If you are buying with a mortgage, remember what’s in The Bankers Jar.

8. A house is a set of liabilities

Not only do you have to pay council tax and utility bills, houses require an endless parade of repairs and maintenance.  Lawns need to be mowed, boilers break and roof tiles sometimes fall off. That’s fine if you are happiest when DIYing… but that’s not really my thing.

A house is not an invincible castle. It can be damaged by weather, fire, vandalism and floods. So people then buy a bunch of expensive insurance to cover these risks.  And most insurance offers lousy value for money.

9. A house is a tax shelter

Because most home owners vote, the tax system is tilted in favour of home ownership. There is no capital gains tax on your house.  You can rent a spare room out and the first £7,500 of income is tax-free.

You don’t pay tax on the rent saved by owning. And paying down your mortgage is a tax efficient home for your monthly savings.  That’s because if the money just sits there in cash earning interest, you are taxed on that interest income*. So you receive a net return.  If you pay off your mortgage, you save the interest before tax. So you receive a gross return.

This is not an argument for investing in a house versus investing in shares. There are also tax shelters for shares in the form of SIPPs (Self Invested Pension Plans) and ISAs (Individual Savings Accounts).

10. A house is an anchor (and a millstone)

People often talk approvingly of the advantages of growing up, settling down and putting down roots. And there’s some truth in that.

But its not the whole truth. When you’re renting, the world is your lobster.  As soon as you buy a house, you are limiting your options. Even if you move and rent it out, be ready to take late night calls informing you that your tenants have broken the boiler.

Buying a house makes more sense if you know you are not going anywhere. We have children and want to give them a settled base for their childhood years.  So The Escape Artist will not be moving to Hawaii or Ibiza just yet as that would make the school run difficult.

Buying a house keeps you locked in one geographical area. This limits your options and allows The Man to hold you down more easily.  This is not so much of an issue if you live in a big city.  But buying a house in the country and commuting long distances by car is not a smart move.

A zen buddhist might say that there are many paths to nirvana.  But, as far as The Escape Artist is aware, no one ever discovered the secrets of true happiness whilst commuting.

*Basic-rate (20%) taxpayers can earn £1,000 interest with no tax.  Higher-rate (40%) taxpayers can earn £500 interest with no tax. Additional-rate (45%) taxpayers have to pay tax on interest received (outside an ISA etc).

15 comments

  1. Excellent article. I’ll be sending it to my children aged 26 to 32 and it doesn’t hurt me to be reminded exactly what our house is.

    1. Thank you for paying it forward!

  2. Superb overview. Too true on 6 – it does.

    In the UK we do seem obsessed with property, people think it never fails and it seems to have become politically unacceptable for prices to fall, which in turn ….

    I’m not sure about nirvana and commuting, but you can get a short doze or meditate on the East Coast mainline 😴

  3. Hi TEA,

    I don’t know what you have against filling a house with shit 😉

    I would suggest rather than Hawaii or Ibiza, maybe look at Monaco for the tax free option – although you will need quite a lot of millions for that, but the school run should be easier by private jet 😉

    I had not thought of it before as being a status symbol – its just somewhere we live – but now I think about it I can see why so many people do mortgage to the hilt. And thanks to your reminder on the inflation of yesteryear I did a quick check to see what I could afford on interest rates. I would have to stop saving into ISAs but I could cope with 10% and no change to my lifestyle, but hopefully all of these over payments are helping make it less and less of an issue!
    Cheers,
    FiL

  4. I love being a home owner…just something about bricks and mortar that I find very reassuring. Great post, thank you😄

  5. Flying Scotsman · · Reply

    Good post! When budgeting for financial independence obviously you need to take into account how much annually you need to spend on maintaining and repairing a house. Just out of interest, how much would you say is required for this? I’ve heard people say anywhere between 1-4% of the value of the house each year. For my own personal budget, I look at 2%. Just wanted to hear your thoughts on this? Do you maintain a spreadsheet monitoring the various house projects, likely depreciation etc? Thanks

  6. I think a house can make you rich if you can get some rental income out of it (i.e. long-term tenants, Airbnb guests). Other than that. It’s just a place to live and something you need to put money towards. Many houses also appreciate like crazy and can make your net work increase significantly, but I wouldn’t say it happens all the time.

  7. SurreyBoy · · Reply

    I think the absence of tenant security when it comes to rent hikes or being moved on at short notice simply exacerbates the UK love-in with the asset class where “you cant go wrong”.

    Its made worse by the low level of state pension – what can you rent when you have to live on a pension at age 67, of £160 a week? For that reason alone most people would like to be mortgage free by retirement. To avoid the streets.

    For all its limitations, home ownership with a mortgage is a form of enforced saving. After 25 years you have something you can live in, cash in, or use to pay the care home fees…..

  8. Survivor · · Reply

    Another thing it’s very easy to forget is that most people own one property – they’ll therefore probably be living in it as its all they can afford, [& even that’s getting harder these days] so it’s putting all your wealth in one deal. Even if you can afford more than one property so as to have an income stream as well as a roof over your head, you’re still dangerously undiversified with respect to investment/asset classes.

    Yes, you can hold instead of selling, so the periodic property crashes don’t affect you over the long term, but if anything happens to your property irrespective of the general trend, [a lot more of the UK is liable to flooding than most people realise for example] then you could be wiped out.

    And as this article points out, most insurance in this country isn’t worth the paper it’s written on, given that to exercise your rights if the time should come you very likely can’t outgun one of [the cartel of giant companies who’re] the main players …..in court. So you might be better off self-insuring since at least you wont cheat yourself by refusing to pay out; but just be disciplined about accumulating the constant emergency fund necessary.

    1. Yep, good points

  9. Good honest article about many aspects of housing.

    One thing though… I often read this very fine blog on my commute, so maybe your last paragraph was a bit off the mark? 😉

  10. Sue Braun · · Reply

    I don’t agree with many points made. If you buy a starter home that is well built, never upgrade and keep it well maintained with adequate necessities, but not the latest and greatest you will have a home for the rest of your life. No need to downsize and if you were smart enough to pay it off early, then a new and lower COL for you.

  11. I find it interesting to look at how the idea of home ownership shifts from generation to generation. I see a lot of the older millennials opting to rent longer into their careers opting to move around much more, pretty aligned with #10 (I don’t think millennials like anchors haha).

  12. michael · · Reply

    The way I see it, a house supplies ‘housing services’ of precisely 1 unit. Those who do not own a house are taking a risk because they have a non-negotiable requirement for one house worth of housing services and the cost of purchasing such a service can vary over time. Or course the monetary vale of a house can vary over time but it will always provide the said unit of ‘housing service’. Thus owning no house or two houses is a risk whereas owning one house is being neither short nor long housing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Mr. Money Mustache

You can escape to financial freedom...

Altucher Confidential

You can escape to financial freedom...

Monevator

You can escape to financial freedom...

Mad Fientist

Financial Independence

jlcollinsnh

The Simple Path to Wealth

%d bloggers like this: