In online financial discussions, there are bears and bulls, boomsters and doomsters.
Sadly, the curse of investing debates is that the bear case often sounds smarter.
To add the impression of evidence, the doomsters often include a link to some crappy online news article…YEAH, BUT WHADDABOUT THIS?!?
This has been particularly so during 2020 during which, to be fair, there has been no shortage of apocalyptic news.
For example, how can a global tracker be down only ~5% year to date [note: posted on 9 June 2020] when eny fule kno that we are in a global pandemic and slow-motion economic train-wreck?
The first point is that, if you are still watching The News, that’s an own-goal. The business model of The News relies on drama and fear. Just because it’s on The News, that doesn’t mean it’s true or representative. It’s the other way round: the less representative something is, the more newsworthy it is. Dog bites man…yawn, boring. Man bites dog…now you’re talking. This is why, when I research a subject, I cut out the middleman and go direct to primary information sources.
The second point is that the stock market is not the economy. The global stock market is made up of the big publicly traded corporations of the world: Big Tech, Big Capital and The Rise of The Machines. The stockmarket does not include the small businesses, independent businesses, local businesses. Last week one of my local gyms went bankrupt; another casualty of lockdown…not a problem for the stock market but a personal tragedy for the young family that ran it.
My third point is that the stockmarket is looking forward. All the news you are seeing relates to what happened in the past. It takes time for official economic data to be gathered, analysed and released so the data The News reports today reflects how the world was last month, last quarter or last year.
In contrast, the stock market is looking far, far out into the future. The value of any asset is the the present value of the future cashflows that will accrue to the owner of that asset. I used to prepare company valuation models and most of the value of the company usually sits in the cashflows beyond the next 5 years.
The “correct” share price is today’s value of the future cash flows to be received by the shareholder. A simple way to think about this is consider the dividends paid on shares. If the annual dividend yield is 2% then it takes you 50 years to get your purchase price back (assuming no sale and no dividend increase). With dividend growth, that duration changes but you get the point. People often say things like “the City is short-term” but the market is actually looking years and decades ahead.
The stock market is like a gigantic supercomputer that gathers information, reflects uncertainty, weighs up all the bets placed and produces prices that reflect (discount) that information and uncertainty. In the jargon, the stockmarket is “efficient”. That means it reflects the available information and uncertainty well enough that you can’t beat the market by reading newspapers, broker research or listening to your mate Dave down the pub.
So how good is that supercomputer? How good is the market at pricing the zillion pieces of information, picking out what’s important and discarding the noise? Well, given the impossible scale of the task, the supercomputer is REALLY, REALLY good at it.
This is not to sat that the market is always right. Working in corporate finance, I got a ringside seat to watch several market bubbles where the market got it wrong. When I started out the Japanese stockmarket was climbing down from an insane 80x price : earnings ratio (at a time when the US stockmarket was trading on ~16x and the UK on ~14x). That was followed by a biotech bubble, a football club bubble, the late 90s tech bubble, the housing credit and sub-prime bubbles, the commodities supercycle (what happened to that?) and another gold bubble.
So the stock market is not 100% efficient. It is not some all-powerful god. But it’s got far more processing power than any one person (or one team of people). This is the problem in the stock market: we know it gives strange results from time to time, but we can only know if it was wrong for sure later: after the bubble is over and The Fat Lady Has Sung.
The supercomputer is much better at handling uncertainty than we are. I don’t think that we humans are wired to naturally understand the concepts of discounting a future that has an infinite range of future possibilities. People often think in binary terms: things get labelled “good” or “bad”. People are terrible at thinking in nuance, probabilities and second order consequences.
This is what Howard Marks calls “Level One Thinking” where people make an observation but don’t consider the knock-on effects or the reactions of other players in the game.
What is second-level thinking?
First level thinking says, “It’s a good company, let’s buy the stock.” Second level thinking says “It’s a good company but everyone thinks its a great company and its not. So the stock’s overated and overpriced; let’s sell”.
First-level thinking says “The outlook calls for low growth and rising inflation. Let’s dump our stocks.” Second-level thinking says “The outlook stinks, but everyone else is selling in panic. Buy!”
First-level thinking says “I think the company’s earnings will fall; sell” Second-level thinking says “I think the company’s earnings will fall less than people expect and the pleasant surprise will lift the stockmarket.The Most Important Thing – Howard Marks
One of the things that confuses rookie investors is that they see stockmarket prices often going UP on bad news and DOWN on good news. How can that be?
The News is useless for investment predictions because a) much of it is untrue, exaggerated or misleading b) nobody knows what’s going to happen in the future and c) even if you knew the timing of big future global events you still wouldn’t be able to reliably play the market correctly because of the way that the stockmarket is already “pricing in” future probabilities and possibilities.
A useful concept here is the idea of The Expectations Treadmill.
Imagine that Amazon is not a company but rather a professional athlete running on one of those treadmill machines that you see in most gyms.
With the amazing past performance of Amazon, the expectations of the market are high and the speed of its treadmill is set to FAST.
So Amazon has to run hard just to keep up with expectations. It only takes one small stumble for Amazon to fail to keep up with the treadmill and the price to fall sharply.
Now imagine a fat and unfit company walks over to the same treadmill. The analysts and investors set the speed low based on what they’ve seen of them in the past. The conveyor belt moves so slowly that it isn’t that hard for our overweight friend to keep up and even outperform the treadmill. That’s your value stock, that is. He may not look good, but in the short term, he’s just as likely to outperform Amazon. You can make a decent argument for tilting towards quality over the longer term. But over the short term its a coinflip.
The beauty of the market is that it’s a supercomputer that aggregates knowledge from millions of sources, updated in real time. Prices are are formed by millions of people with different information and opinions. All have skin in the game; they are backing those opinions up with real money: people’s hard-earned savings. By investing in a global equity tracker fund, you can “piggy-back” off the power of this supercomputer.
What if you want to try to maximise returns and beat the competition? Well, there are 3 sources of potential competitive advantage (known as edge) when investing in the stock market.
The first is to out-work the competition. This is the route attempted by most professional fund managers who get up earlier in the morning, stay up later at night, read more reports, got to more meetings, send more emails and have more heart attacks. It’s hard to outwork a supercomputer. So for those of us that want to be rich for an easy life, this is not a very promising avenue of exploration.
The second is to out-think the competition. The Buffetts & Mungers of this world read widely, think deeply and put their money where their mouth (or should that be mind?) is. This is risky as there is a blurred line between genius and insanity. Being early is hard to distinguish from being wrong and true thinkers don’t care about being thought wrong nor laughed at in public. For those of us that are not Einstein nor Professor of Hard Sums at Harvard University, this is not a very promising avenue of exploration.
The third approach is to control our emotions, think long term, keep calm and carry on. This involves knowing our limitations and controlling our ego. Our internal demons are pride, fear, greed, exuberance and anxiety. If you can control these, you will get better results than 99% of people. You can do this and pick individual stocks but it’s a LOT safer and easier to power your compounding machine with a low cost global equity index tracker.
Get extra content (and first sight of new articles) by signing up for my weekly email 👇