I’m as big a fan of financial education and open discussion as anyone – but most financial discussions online are woefully poor.
On the internet, the blind lead the blind. There are always boomsters and doomsters but the curse of investing is that the bear case looks smarter.
To add the spurious impression of evidence, the doomsters often “back up” their argument with a link to some crappy online article…YEAH, BUT WHADDABOUT THIS?!?
This has always been so but its been particularly prevalent in 2020 during which, to be fair, there has been no shortage of apocalyptic news. How can a global tracker be down only ~5% when eny fule kno that we are in a global pandemic and the slow-motion economic train-wreck that is lockdown?
The first point is that, if you are still watching The News, that’s an own-goal. Just because you see something on The News, that doesn’t mean it’s accurate or representative. It’s more like the other way round: the less representative something is, the more newsworthy it is. Dog bites man…yawn, boring. Man bites dog…now you’re talking.
The News Media is eating itself. I avoid media disinformation by going direct to primary sources. For example, if I want to know about CV-19, I can watch the interviews with epidemiologists myself; unfiltered and straight from the horses mouth. It’s better to cut out the middlemen. Much of the mainstream media is rapidly being dis-intermediated into bankruptcy and irrelevance.
My second point is that the stockmarket is not the economy. The global stockmarket is made up of the big publicly traded corporations of the world. The stockmarket is made up of Big Tech, Big Capital and The Rise of The Machines.
The stockmarket does not include the small businesses, the independent private businesses, the (good) pubs and restaurants, the local businesses. Last week one of our local gyms went bankrupt; another casualty of lockdown…not a problem for the stockmarket but a personal tragedy for the young family that ran it.
My third point is that the stockmarket is looking forward. All the economic data you are seeing relates to last year, or last quarter or last month. All the news you are seeing relates to what happened yesterday.
In contrast, the stock exchange is looking far, far out into the future. Anyone who has prepared discounted cashflow models valuing companies knows that a large percentage of the value of the company usually sits in the continuing value: the perpetuity value of the cashflows outside the explicit forecast cashflow period.
The value of any asset is the the present value of the future cashflows that will accrue to the owner of that asset. So the “correct” share price is today’s value of the future dividends to be received by the shareholder.
A simple way to think about this is consider the dividends paid on shares. If the annual dividend yield is 2% then it takes you 50 years to get your purchase price back (assuming no sale and no dividend increase). With dividend growth, that duration changes but you get the point. People often say things like “the City is short-term” but the market is actually looking years and decades ahead.
The stockmarket is like a gigantic super-computer that gathers information, reflects uncertainty, weighs up all the bets placed and produces prices that reflect that information and that uncertainty. In the jargon, the stockmarket is “efficient”. That means it reflects the available information and uncertainty well enough that you can’t beat the market by reading newspapers, broker research or listening to your mate Dave down the pub.
So how good is that super-computer? How good is the market at pricing the zillion pieces of information, picking out what’s important and discarding the noise? Well, given the impossible scale of the task, the super-computer is REALLY, REALLY good at it.
This is not to sat that the market is always right. The stockmarket is not 100% efficient. It is not some all-powerful deity or omnipotent being. But it’s got more computing power than any one mortal individual.
The beauty of working in corporate finance was that I got a ringside seat to watch several market bubbles. When I started out the Japanese stockmarket was climbing down from an insane 80x price : earnings ratio (at a time when the US stockmarket was trading on ~16x and the UK on ~14x). That was followed by a biotech bubble, a football club bubble, the late 90s tech bubble, the housing credit and sub-prime bubbles, the commodities supercycle (what happened to that?) and another gold bubble.
So this is the problem in the stockmarket: we know it does crazy things from time to time, but we can only know for sure in retrospect after The Fat Lady Has Sung.
I don’t think that people are wired to easily understand the concepts of price discovery, uncertainty and discounting the future. People often think in binary terms: things get labelled “good” or “bad”. People are terrible at thinking in nuance, probabilities and second order consequences.
This is what Howard Marks calls “Level One Thinking”. Level One Thinking makes an observation but doesn’t consider the knock-on effects or the reactions of other players in the game.
What is second-level thinking?
First level thinking says, “It’s a good company, let’s buy the stock.” Second level thinking says “It’s a good company but everyone thinks its a great company and its not. So the stock’s overated and overpriced; let’s sell”.
First-level thinking says “The outlook calls for low growth and rising inflation. Let’s dump our stocks.” Second-level thinking says “The outlook stinks, but everyone else is selling in panic. Buy!”
First-level thinking says “I think the company’s earnings will fall; sell” Second-level thinking says “I think the company’s earnings will fall less than people expect and the pleasant surprise will lift the stockmarket.The Most Important Thing – Howard Marks
One of the things that confuses rookie investors is that, pretty early on, they realise that stockmarket prices often go UP on bad news and DOWN on good news. How can that be?
A useful concept here is the idea of The Expectations Treadmill. Imagine that Amazon is not a company but rather a professional athlete running on one of those treadmill machines that you see in most gyms.
With the amazing past performance of Amazon, the expectations of the market are high and so Amazon has the speed of its treadmill set FAST. So Amazon has to run hard just to keep up with analyst and investor expectations. It only takes one small stumble for Amazon to fail to keep up with the expectations treadmill and the price to fall sharply.
Now imagine a fat and unfit company walks over to the same treadmill. The analysts and investors watch them walk up and they set the speed low based on what they’ve seen of them in the past. The conveyor belt moves so slowly that it isn’t that hard for our overweight friend to keep up and even outperform the treadmill. That’s your value stock, that is. He may not look good, but in the short term, your clapped out value stock is just as likely to outperform the ripped Amazon. You can make a decent argument for tilting towards quality over the longer term. But its a coinflip over the short term.
It’s currently very easy on the internet to find someone who says that the stockmarket is not pricing in the possibility of a second wave of CV-19. I don’t think there will be a second wave (of deaths, not just infections) but, even if I’m wrong, the stockmarket has already considered that and priced in the uncertainty. How dumb would you have to be to think that you are the only person that has considered that? What is your edge?
On the internet, people trade words, arguments and hot air. Talk is not only cheap, its free and its worth every penny that you didn’t pay for it. That is the problem with free content.
The beauty of the market is that people have skin in the game and the opinions are backed by real money: people’s hard-earned savings.
I send out occasional emails out with my thoughts on investing and news of what I’m up to. You can sign up for those emails below 👇