Originally published 2020, updated July 2021
I sometimes think that saving has a PR problem.
Saving is often seen as something that’s a bit boring or something that you do when you are in fear (e.g. of losing your job).
But saving is the foundation of your financial security.
When you have a secure financial base, you can go on the offensive and take the fight to the enemy. You can afford to take more risk. And more risk should mean more reward.
When investing, the stronger the foundations of your financial castle, the braver you should be.
Remember: first things first…clear that expensive debt and get a cash emergency fund in place. But after that, you can afford to be braver with your money, take equity risk and buy into the stockmarket.
The braver you are, the higher your expected returns should be:
With savings, you can also be braver in your career / your business as well.
As you get promoted up the ladder things, you may have to accept more career risk. Things can feel more precarious higher up the greasy pole. A higher salary makes you a juicier cost saving for an incoming CEO. As you get higher up the chain you realise that everyone is making it up as they go along. Safety and stability are illusions.
Beware the boss that knows you are desperate. Beware the salesman with debt commitments and a flashy lifestyle to support. They need the next sale and the next commission too badly to be ethically scrupulous.
This is not just a financial thing. But money is a big part of it. You can’t be truly fearless without some degree of financial security. Especially if you are providing for a family and people depend on you.
The importance of saving
Its time for more people to get excited by savings. So today I’m going back to basics to explain the importance of your savings rate.
Your % saving rate is the most important number in personal finance. It’s the most important metric for you to track.
How do you calculate your savings rate? If you move half of your salary (after tax has been deducted) to your investment account (aka your compounding machine) each month, that’s a 50% savings rate. Yes, you can make it more complicated than that (depending on how you treat pension contributions and so on) but it’s better to be roughly right than precisely wrong.
Remember that debt repayment (e.g. the capital element of mortgage payments) counts as savings. You can increase your net worth either by reducing debt or by increasing your assets. In my book, capital investments (e.g. loft conversions and extensions) in a house that you are planning to sell at some point and get a return on your investment also count as saving (rather than consumption).
Here’s the graph that showed me how powerful your % savings rate is:
On the y axis we have the time until the person reaches retirement. Or more accurately financial independence, the position where work is voluntary.
On the x axis we have the % savings rate, the proportion of post tax salary that a person is able to save and invest. As we go from left to right, the savings rate goes from 5% of post-tax income (68 years to financial independence) up to 50% (where it takes 17 years to get to financial independence) and beyond.
Isn’t it strange how your % saving rate is far more important than your % investment returns?…and yet % returns are what people focus on and obsess about (actively encouraged by the financial services industry). It’s really easy to get decent investment returns with a global equities tracker. The hard thing is to save consistently.
I still remember the lightbulb moment when I realised that there’s no point in earning a higher income if that doesn’t lead to higher % savings rate. Your income (expressed as £/$/€) doesn’t directly affect when you can retire. Higher income just allows you to save a higher % of your income without extreme frugality.
To show you how these numbers are built up, here’s the maths for the 50% savings rate (~17 years to financial independence). The numbers in this old example are too low but they scale: it’s the percentages that matter. A 50% savings rate means it takes 17 years to get to financial independence regardless of the actual amount you earn.
In the example above, our investor reaches financial independence in year 17 when their invested net worth exceeds 25x their annual spending and their withdrawal rate is below 4%.
This means that you can bring the finish line closer either by saving more or spending less. These two approaches work hand in hand.
If you are just starting out, don’t let the high percentages put you off. I accept that for many people these figures will not be achievable (or at least not yet and not without a crazy level of frugality). I’m sharing them because they illustrate powerful concepts. When you want to help people, you tell them the truth.
What’s interesting about the shape of the graph is that it’s non-linear (i.e. curved) so that the time taken to get to financial independence falls rapidly as the % savings rate is increased. You get a BIG improvement (in speed to FI) when going from a savings rate of 10% to 20%.
Less so when going from 50% to 60%. If that marginal increase in savings rate makes your life miserable, then it would be a mistake for you. Everyone has to figure out their own “sweet spot”. This is a very personal consideration for everyone so I’m not saying what is right or wrong, I’m just illustrating the trade offs.
2020 has provided a fascinating illustration of what is possible in terms of increasing your savings rate. The UK aggregate saving rate went from less than 5% to ~30% during lockdown as many more people discovered Monk Mode.
What seems impossible for you right now may be possible for you in a few years time. Where attention goes, energy flows. Or something like that.
What are your assumptions?
Models are simplified versions of reality that illustrate important concepts. The assumptions that sit behind these illustrations are:
- you never do any more paid work;
- you never get any state pension or other benefits;
- 5% real (excluding inflation) investment returns; and
- a safe withdrawal rate of 4%.
These calculations are all based on the idea of a safe withdrawal rate. In most scenarios in the past, this has meant that the retiree actually end up dying with a large pot: there is no de-accumulation where investment returns are 5% and you are only spending / withdrawing 4% per annum. For people who want / expect to run down their pot during retirement, these calculations may be too conservative.
This is not deprivation
When people see graphs like the one above, a common reaction is: I don’t want to give up all the fun in my life!
The implicit assumption is that everyone is spending efficiently, consciously and mindfully. That’s just not true. I could give you a million examples but here is just one. I recently bought a navy blue cap for £2.99. Price is what you pay, value is what you get. I could have spent £45 on an almost identical cap. You choose the price.
I hope you can see that buying the £2.99 version is not deprivation.
It’s the sum total of thousands of decisions like this over the years that leads to results so good that it almost seems like magic. This is The Aggregation of Marginal Gains.
Don’t get me wrong
Saving is a wonderful thing. But even the best ideas can be taken too far. It has to be sustainable and you have to enjoy the journey or else you won’t stay stick to The Path.
Plugging the leaks in your spending bucket and saving money is super-important but don’t be penny-wise, pound-foolish. The problem for extreme frugalistas is that they won’t spend any money on health, self-development or education. If you are saving money by not buying books that could change your life, that’s a rookie mistake. Invest in yourself.
Not everyone can be a high earner or reach financial independence by 40 or whenever. But everyone can learn to get better with money. This is why I say that the tools of financial independence are for everyone.
Amazing things are possible over time once you get started on The Path.
The new content is on my email list
I’m writing new content for my (free) email list. I’m aiming to write about 3 or 4 emails for each new blogpost. If you’re not on the email list, you’ll miss out on new content.
The beauty of having an email list is that you can always reach your core audience…those interested enough to sign up to an email list. As a side benefit, the email format also feels more personal and I get quality feedback by email.
So if in future you are wondering why my blogpost production has slowed down or even stopped, the answer is that it hasn’t, it’s moved onto my email list (it’s free and you can sign up below ).
The best way to get new content is to sign up to my email list: